<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Khatib Law, APC</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Khatib Law, APC</subtitle>

    <updated>2026-04-16T20:33:02Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com" />
    <id>https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.026447477834286803" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.4">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1103133/2023/04/cropped-kl-site-icon-32x32.png</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Khatib Law, APC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Your first steps after a potential wrongful termination]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/blog/2026/02/your-first-steps-after-a-potential-wrongful-termination/" />
            <id>https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/?p=47408</id>
            <updated>2026-02-11T15:09:28Z</updated>
            <published>2026-02-11T15:09:28Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Losing your job can be an emotional whirlwind. Beyond the financial stress, it leaves you doubting yourself. The sudden news can feel unfair, especially when your recent performance has been nothing but positive. If you feel your employer vaguely addressed the reasons for your dismissal, they may be hiding an unlawful motive. In California, it is unlawful for employers to…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/blog/2026/02/your-first-steps-after-a-potential-wrongful-termination/"><![CDATA[Losing your job can be an emotional whirlwind. Beyond the financial stress, it leaves you doubting yourself. The sudden news can feel unfair, especially when your recent performance has been nothing but positive.

If you feel your employer vaguely addressed the reasons for your dismissal, they may be hiding an unlawful motive. In California, it is unlawful for employers to terminate an employee based on protected characteristics.
<h2>Did your employer break the rules?</h2>
While California follows the at-will principle, your employer must follow certain boundaries. Under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), termination based on race, gender, age or disability is illegal. Furthermore, the California Labor Code prohibits <a href="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/wrongful-termination/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-wpel-link="internal">termination as a form of retaliation</a> against whistleblowers.

Additionally, your employer should respect the terms and conditions provided in the employment agreement. If your contract mentions that you may only be terminated for specific reasons, the supervisor must abide by those terms. Otherwise, their breach constitutes wrongful termination.
<h2>How should you respond to a sudden termination?</h2>
Establishing a paper trail is a must. To build your case, here are the common documents to prepare:
<ul>
 	<li aria-level="1">Annual performance reviews</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">Termination notice</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">Communication threads</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">Witness testimonies</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">Disciplinary notices</li>
</ul>
These can help you build a timeline that shows how your termination occurred. Documenting these details while they are fresh in your mind is vital for proving your case later.
<h2>Why do you need to act immediately?</h2>
According to the Civil Rights Department, there are deadlines you must meet for <a href="https://calcivilrights.ca.gov/complaintprocess/" target="_blank" rel="noopener external noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">filing a complaint</a>. While the statute of limitations is generally three years from the date of the dismissal, this may not apply to all wrongful termination claims.

Determining which deadline applies to you can be overwhelming, especially when you are still processing the shock of a job loss. An employment attorney can review your case and help you navigate the legal complexities of filing a complaint.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Khatib Law, APC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Demystifying the At-Will Doctrine]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/blog/2021/07/demystifying-the-at-will-doctrine/" />
            <id>https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/?p=46671</id>
            <updated>2023-04-26T19:51:43Z</updated>
            <published>2021-07-15T05:52:30Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Wrongfully terminated employees often mistakenly believe there is nothing they can do about an employer’s unfair termination because the at-will doctrine dictates that employment may be terminated at the will of either party, “for any or no reason.” This narrow and mistaken understanding of the at-will doctrine results in 1) far too many unlawful terminations; 2) employees failing to hold…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/blog/2021/07/demystifying-the-at-will-doctrine/"><![CDATA[Wrongfully terminated employees often mistakenly believe there is nothing they can do about an employer’s unfair termination because the at-will doctrine dictates that employment may be terminated at the will of either party, “for any or no reason.” This narrow and mistaken understanding of the at-will doctrine results in 1) far too many unlawful terminations; 2) employees failing to hold their employer accountable for unlawful termination; and 3) employees leaving their just and deserved compensation on the table.

It is true that the at-will doctrine, codified in the California Labor Code, establishes that an employer may terminate an employee at will, absent contractual provisions to the contrary. Employers are not required to provide a warning or an objective evaluation to justify a termination. In short, an employer can terminate an employee for a good reason, a bad reason, an arbitrary reason, or no reason at all; but it cannot terminate an employee for an illegal reason.

There are many illegal reasons why employers fire employees. The following are a few of the most common unlawful reasons: 1) an employee has a disability that requires some reasonable accommodation; 2) an employee took a medical leave of absence for their own or a close family member’s medical condition; 3) an employee’s age; 4) an employee’s complaint about sexual harassment; or 5) an employee’s complaint about workplace safety or some unlawful conduct at work. Employers cannot use the at-will doctrine to avoid liability on an unlawful discharge.

When an employer wrongfully terminates an employee, they typically provide a false cover story, or pretext, about the employee’s performance to justify the termination. It is not surprising that employers create these cover stories, lest they reveal unlawful animus and subject themselves to legal liability. Employees must be aware of this phenomenon and be suspicious of a termination justification unsupported by or inconsistent with the facts. If an employer terminates an employee on false or unsubstantiated grounds, the employee may be entitled to substantial compensation for lost wages, emotional distress, and possibly punitive damages. The at-will doctrine will not insulate an employer from accountability for wrongful termination.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Khatib Law, APC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Suffering in Silence is No Virtue]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/blog/2021/06/suffering-in-silence-is-no-virtue/" />
            <id>https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/?p=46673</id>
            <updated>2023-04-26T19:51:51Z</updated>
            <published>2021-07-01T05:54:05Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[It is not virtuous or even commendable to suffer silently in the face of harassment, discrimination or retaliation from your employer. An employer, manager or supervisor that engages in bad behavior will likely repeat that behavior if they are not held accountable for it. Your silence robs you of compensation. It could damage your future employment prospects and emotional well-being.…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.calemploymentattorneys.com/blog/2021/06/suffering-in-silence-is-no-virtue/"><![CDATA[It is not virtuous or even commendable to suffer silently in the face of harassment, discrimination or retaliation from your employer. An employer, manager or supervisor that engages in bad behavior will likely repeat that behavior if they are not held accountable for it. Your silence robs you of compensation. It could damage your future employment prospects and emotional well-being. It may also lead to unforeseen, destructive societal consequences.

To assess the societal implications, it is useful to examine California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, or FEHA. The mission of FEHA is to protect employees in California from discrimination and harassment by providing employees legal avenues to hold their employers accountable (i.e. make them pay you money) for harassing, discriminatory or retaliatory conduct. This legal framework is vital on both a micro and macro level. On a micro level, it provides aggrieved employees with a path to compensation for employer misconduct. On a macro level, it serves as an impetus for employers to take the necessary steps to minimize instances of harassment and discrimination in the workplace.

In California, employers pay massive sums of money to settle harassment, discrimination and retaliation claims. Trial verdicts for plaintiffs in employment cases are often well above six figures and sometimes reach seven and eight figure sums. As a result, prudent employers take significant and costly steps to reduce the possibility of misconduct that might violate FEHA. This includes policy development and employee training that emphasizes opposition to harassment, discrimination and retaliation in the workplace. This emphasis on improving policies and practices to avoid FEHA claims (in order to avoid paying large settlements and trial awards), has undoubtedly advanced the overarching goal of FEHA, reducing harassment and discrimination in the workplace. That is precisely how FEHA was designed to work.

The advancement of FEHA’s purpose has been made possible by employees’ willingness to use its legal framework to hold employers accountable. If employees instead decided to ignore FEHA and accept harassment and discrimination at work, employers would undoubtedly place less emphasis on preventing harassment and discrimination. If discrimination and harassment do not cost the employer anything than why would they try so hard to prevent it? Employees that ignore wrongful conduct by their employers are inviting more of it.

This dynamic is apparent in any number of straightforward examples. If a supervisor sexually harasses his female subordinate and suffers no consequences, he is more likely to repeat his misconduct. What will happen to this supervisor’s next female subordinate? Or, what if a district manager criticizes Hispanic store managers more harshly for substantially the same performance/conduct of non-Hispanic store managers? What if this harsher approach led to employment termination for a Hispanic store manager who was performing at the same level as his non-Hispanic counterparts? If the Hispanic store manager decides to ignore this discriminatory conduct, what are the chances the district manager will stop his discriminatory behavior?

Speaking out against employer misconduct is not easy. It is difficult to measure with precision how often employer misconduct remains unreported. 1 university study on sexual harassment in the workplace estimated that 99% of sexual harassment incidents go unreported. The fear of retaliation leaves far too many victims believing silence is their best option. FEHA provides a better option. A victimized employee can fight back and pursue substantial financial compensation. An employee that fights against employer misconduct can also rest easier knowing they are helping reduce harassment and discrimination in the workplace.

An employee that fights against employer misconduct can reap personal financial benefit while advancing the cause of justice in the workplace.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>